Servant Leadership – Going Deeper

GroupJohn is the manager of a twenty person department.  He’s beyond exhausted, he’s burnt out.  And he feels great about that.

John works very hard to make sure that every single employee performs at a high level, in order to achieve the goals that were set in the strategic planning meetings the previous year.  It requires a great deal of effort on his part and long hours but that’s how he got to be “the leader,” he is the cream that rose to the top.

Productivity indicators for his department are down for the third straight quarter, however, and John feels the pressure to up his leadership game.  In a time of reflection one day, over a cold cup of coffee and half a bagel, he decides to try being a servant leader.  On the morning commute the next day he ponders how he could go the extra mile to do something nice for the people in his department.  Some day instead of having his administrative assistant go down to the cafe to get his coffee he will go and get his own.  And at their monthly meetings to review objectives he will take the minutes himself instead of asking someone else to do it.  And once the objectives are met he will take everyone out for lunch.  That should cover it.

When John tells the admin one morning that he will go get his own coffee, she is surprised by his offer.  John is surprised that she seems disappointed.  The coffee that John comes back with isn’t near as good as what he normally has, and it puts him in a bad mood for the rest of the day.

When John volunteers himself to take the minutes at the next department meeting it raises a few eyebrows around the table.  The week following the meeting is especially busy, and John struggles to find the extra time for the task, leaving him even more stressed and tired.  When he finally gets them out they’re not very good and don’t communicate well the outcomes of the meeting.

A few months later the results of various projects aren’t as good as John would like, but there’s a holiday coming up and his schedule is relatively open the day before the holiday.  He figures this is a good time to provide everyone a free lunch.  The task of setting up the lunch adds to John’s burdens and not many people show up for the lunch.

John’s efforts to be a servant leader met with mixed results.  But he’s sure that the department respects him more now for it.  And though it left him wearier than ever, John actually sees this as a good sign.  In the article he read on servant leadership it talked about sacrifice.  So if he feels worse as a result of being a servant leader than he must be doing something right.  Right?
GreenLineTom is also a manager of a twenty person department.  Tom is well aware of what is expected of his department, and his department has a history of exceeding expectations.  What’s first on Tom’s mind, however, is the welfare and growth of those who work in his department.  He knows that as they grow they will not only develop as persons but they will become better equipped for whatever challenges their department may face.

Jan, the administrative assistant to the department, is glad to go down to the cafe each morning to get a cup of coffee for Tom.  She usually adds a little something extra with it.  She knows that her task enables Tom to do better at his job each day.  This is her way of making a contribution.

Jan is also a trusted adviser to Tom.  By the nature of her job she has a good overall idea of what is going on.  Tom welcomes her feedback on the impact past decisions have had on people in the department.  And Tom often seeks out her insight on how future decisions might fit into the big picture.

Whenever an issue arises that has a broad impact across the department or needs the input of several diverse perspectives Tom calls a department meeting.  He usually has Ellen, a senior technical writer in the group, work with Andy to set up the meetings.  Ellen has a lot of experience in event planning from a previous job.  Event planning is a skill set that Andy wishes to develop.  By working together Andy is able to learn from Ellen, and Ellen’s busy schedule isn’t complicated by the details of setting up the meeting.

When it comes to taking minutes, Tom assigns the task to a newer employee in the group.  It gives them a chance to learn more about the workings of the department.  But since they may not be familiar with all the language and activities of the department, Tom also asks a longer-term employee to work with them.  They have a chance to learn from each other and often it even develops into a mentoring relationship.

Tom is careful however not to assign the task of note taker to Carmen.  In an open conversation between the two of them one day Tom learned that Carmen has a slight hearing loss.  Normally it doesn’t cause any problems for her, but in a meeting it can be harder for her to follow the conversation.  Note taking would be particularly difficult for Carmen.  And Tom is also careful to avoid holding meetings in the Grand View room.  The room is a spectacular setting, but the vaulted hardwood ceilings make for lousy acoustics.

After the department had worked extra hard to wrap up a key project, Tom thought it would be good to celebrate by taking the department out for lunch.  Instead he decided to ask everyone what they thought.  To his surprise they decided they wanted to do a potluck.  It gave everyone a chance to add their own personal touch to the celebration and it was a nice way to learn more about each other.   Ellen and Andy were more than happy to set it up.  And the Grand View Room made a wonderful setting for the occasion.

Tom recognizes that he’s a servant leader.  He’s committed to that and his own personal development is a priority, because he knows how important it is for each person, including himself, to give of their unique skills.  Tom also recognizes that it is not his position as manager that makes him the leader. He is a leader because he is willing to serve. Jan is a leader because she makes her own contribution.  Ellen, Andy, Carmen and every single person in the department recognizes that they each have the responsibility to serve in their own way.  And in their service they lead.  They work hard to get the job done and do it well.  But first and foremost they work hard to ensure that everyone involved is enriched and grows from the work.  It can be a lot of effort, but it brings them to life.  They are eager to get to work each day because they know they have a purpose there.  And they are eager to get back home because the day has left them better equipped to face the rest of life.
GreenLineIs John a servant leader?  Is John even a leader at all?  Who would you rather work for, John or Tom? How could an employee in John’s department be a servant leader? What could Tom do to be a better servant leader?

Servant Leadership isn’t a leader going the extra mile
to do something nice for others.
Servant Leadership is a servant going deeper
to be someone of significance to others.


Image courtesy of Renjith Krishnan at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

An Archaic Definition of Leadership

LeadershipDefnArchaic2 “A position as a leader of a group, organization, etc.”  This is Merriam-Webster’s primary definition of the word leadership.  I envision that someday there will be an italicized word next to this definition – archaic.

First of all there is no need for using the word leadership in this way.  There is already a better word for this, it’s management.  When referring to a position within an organization, just call it management.  Management is about position, structure, authority, business.  Leadership is about people, relationship, influence, life.

Often leadership is used to distinguish upper management from lower management.  But again this isn’t necessary.  Call it upper management or executive management.  Please don’t call it senior management, though, that has its own issues.  Senior management conjures up images of silverbacks in the boardroom drinking their discount coffee.

Many times leadership is used as a euphemism for management, to glorify management.  This has the opposite effect, however, if you stop and think about it.  It suggests that management has such a negative connotation that it needs to be called something else in order to be respected.  But this is absolutely not the case.  The position of manager is a very distinguished role within an organization.  If there is a negative connotation it is an issue with the person in the position and not the position itself, and needs to be addressed as such.  Call management management and respect it for what it is.

Within the role of manager is a great opportunity to serve the people of the organization.  And within that service then is a great opportunity for leadership.  The leadership comes not from the position itself but from the service carried out within that role.  Service builds trust.  Trust builds leadership.  The key thing to remember is that this is true of any role within the organization, not just management.

Not only is it unnecessary to use the term leadership to describe management but it is also harmful.  It’s not just a matter of semantics.  To me this is a moral issue.  I firmly believe that there is no greater impediment to individual growth and personal fulfillment than all the confusion around leadership.  And it is just as much a detriment to those in management as those on the outside, if not more.  I’ve gone into detail on this in the past and I’m sure I will again in the future.

Here is an exercise to help think this through.  For one day, challenge yourself to pause for a second every time you are about to use the word leadership.  Consider what you are referring to and ask yourself – Is this really about leadership or am I in fact talking about management?  If it’s management then use the word management.  If indeed you are discussing leadership then by all means use the word leadership.  Just call it what it is.

It may seem pretentious of me to want to rewrite the dictionary.  The main point is that we have a great opportunity at hand.  Our concepts of organizations are being redefined and rethought.  The structured paradigm of the industrial age is crumbling.  Now is a very good time to pause and think about how we use the word leadership.

When Helping is a Disservice

LendAHandServant leadership is more than doing something nice for others.  Yes, kind and generous actions are a key element.  But the more you assess the situation and the better you understand those being served, the more that all involved will experience the full richness of servant leadership.  Without it your actions could actually be a disservice to those you are attempting to serve.

Robert Greenleaf said the test of servant leadership is this,

“Do those served grow as persons? Do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants?”

To deepen my understanding of servant leadership I periodically form and refine my own definition.

To serve is to live in such a way that others become more from what I do.  Servant leadership is serving in a way that others become servants who lead.

Before you reach out, reflect within on a few questions.

  • Does my service help them reach their goals?  Or is my only objective to achieve my own goals?
  • Does my service help them to become more skilled, more knowledgeable, more self-aware?  If I do what they are able to do themselves,  will I deny them an opportunity to learn and grow?
  • Does my service help them to become more self-sufficient and self-confident?  Or is there a risk they will become dependent on my assistance?
  • How will their life be different as a result of my service?  What change will this bring about?
    • Are they prepared for this change?  Will they be equipped for the new reality?
    • Are they involved in the process enough to feel ownership of the results?
  • Does my service allow me to be enriched by the experience?  If service is harmful to the one who is serving, it is a disservice to all.  We each have our own unique gifts to share.  And if anyone, even the servant, becomes less we all become less.  Give of yourself without giving up yourself.

A key is relationship.  In relationship we gain the understanding necessary to serve effectively.  In relationship an act of kindness becomes a message of love.  In relationship we share responsibility for the outcome.  In relationship we grow and become more from what we do.  In relationship we lead.

Go the extra mile to do something special for others,
but also go deeper to be someone of significance to others.

Image: foto76 / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Organizational Leadership?

FlyingFlock

The words ‘Organizational Leadership’ can seem incongruous.  The key elements of leadership are very personal and relational.  How does that fit within a structured group environment? Basically, leadership is leadership, and Organizational Leadership is leadership that occurs within an organization.  But it does present special challenges and opportunities, and in the context of certain leadership principles ‘Organizational Leadership’ does make sense.

Leaders lead people. 

Leaders don’t lead programs or projects or processes.  Those things are managed.  The people involved in them are led.

Organizations are people.

And like people, organizations are defined not by what they do but by who they are.  It is first and foremost about the being of the organization – the story, the beliefs, the abilities, the culture of shared values, the vision.  This is then lived out and reflected in what the organization does.  Leaders of the organization focus first on leading the organization and the individuals within it to know who they are and to become more.

Leadership isn’t found on an org chart.

There are operational concerns with organizations that need to be handled by managers.  But the responsibility of leading people should not be placed solely on these same people.  Whatever role a person has within an organization, manager or not, they will be more effective in that role the more they are capable, committed and free to lead.

Organizations exist ultimately for the benefit of the individual.

Organizations provide efficiency that allows individuals to accomplish more than they could on their own.  But more importantly organizations provide an environment that allows individuals to become more than they would ever realize on their own.

Organizational success is marked by individual growth.

Using individuals for the sake of the work of the organization will not bring sustainable success.  If individuals within the organization are not becoming more as a result of their being a part of the organization, the organization is not fulfilling its ultimate purpose.  The responsibility to fulfill this organizational purpose falls on each individual, to respond as called upon to be a leader to others around them.

Take a moment to think about each organization that you are a part of, both occupational and volunteer, and ask yourself – Am I finding personal fulfillment and growth from being a part of this organization?  Are those of us within the organization clear on who we are, and who we want to become, as an organization?  Is this honestly reflected in what we do?  How am I a leader within this organization, serving others that they may find personal fulfillment and growth?

“In organizations, real power and energy is generated through relationships. The patterns of relationships and the capacities to form them are more important than tasks, functions, roles, and positions.”  Margaret Wheatly

“An empowered organization is one in which individuals have the knowledge, skill, desire, and opportunity to personally succeed in a way that leads to collective organizational success.” Stephen R. Covey

“The quality of leadership, more than any other single factor, determines the success or failure of an organization.” Fred Fiedler & Martin Chemers

Image: Liz Noffsinger / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

What is Servant Leadership?

MountainLeadServant leadership – what exactly is it?  How is it unique from other perspectives on leadership? Who or what is it that is served?  What does it mean to be a follower of a servant leader?

One of my goals in 2013 is to explore those questions.  I want to learn more of how others define and live out servant leadership, and better formulate my own understanding of it.  For now I set a marker on the trail, to measure against later, laying out here what I believe servant leadership is, and what it is not.

Servant Leadership is not self serving.

One element that is clear is that servant leadership is not self serving.  Being a leader doesn’t mean that I have somehow become more at the expense of others becoming less.  Becoming a leader is not the outcome of a competition with others.

Servant Leadership is not self deprecating.

While I do not become more from others becoming less, it is also true that others do not become more from my becoming less.  A distinction of servant leadership is that I give of myself.  But to give of myself does not mean that I give up myself.  Servant leadership isn’t self serving, nor is it self deprecating.

Service is not sacrifice, it is surrender.*

More precisely, service is not sacrifice of self, it is surrender to us.  As a servant leader I surrender to a different reality where all grow because each grows.  I give of myself, and I lead others to give of themselves.  Together we serve each other in order that what we do brings us to a place where we all become more.

By influence, not authority;
by heart, not title;
by relationship, not structure –
leaders lift people
and bring all together
on higher ground.

How exactly does this come to be? How is this lived out in the day-to-day? Well, this is all part of what I have yet to learn.

“It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first.
Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead.
That person is sharply different from one who is leader first.”
Robert Greenleaf

Photo courtesy of AESThetic Photography

 ________________________________________

* While this view of service and sacrifice seemingly conflicts with the writings of Robert Greenleaf, who stated that sacrifice is a key part of servant leadership, our views are much the same in concept.  He wrote, “I believe that the essential quality that sets servant-leaders apart from others is that they live by their conscience – the inward moral sense of what is right and what is wrong. That one quality is the difference between leadership that works and leadership – like servant leadership – that endures.” and “The essence of moral authority or conscience is sacrifice – the subordinating of one’s self or one’s ego to a higher purpose, cause, or principle.”  What he describes as sacrifice is similar to what I describe as surrender.  I hesitate to use the word sacrifice because of the connotations that have been ascribed to use of the word.  People tend to assume a reference to the subordination of self to others, but what Robert Greenleaf espoused was the subordination of self to a higher purpose.

Leadership of the Heart

IceCanoeBy data I know.
By reason I trust.
By faith I believe.

As a leader,
I can use data to convince people to follow.

As a leader,
I can use reason to persuade people to follow.

But in a place beyond logic and reason,
when people have faith in me as a leader and belief in the vision,
then leadership of the heart occurs.

This requires relationship.

To lead by heart is an honor.
But more so it is humbling, for leader and follower together
serve a purpose greater than any one alone could ever realize.

When you follow, follow your heart,
and choose your leaders wisely.
And when by heart you are chosen to lead
grab hold of that which you could never possess

and lead on!